Appendix a โ€” ๐Ÿ’ฐ The 50/50 Savings Split

The 50/50 Health Savings Split: Making Cures More Profitable Than Treatments

Pharmaceutical companies arenโ€™t evil. Theyโ€™re just following incentives. Right now, the incentives say: โ€œKeep people sick forever, bill monthly.โ€

This chapter explains how to change those incentives so curing you becomes more profitable than milking you like a diseased cash cow until you die.

The Problem: Your Disease Is Their Annuity

Hereโ€™s how pharma currently makes money:

Diabetes:

  • Treatment cost: $500/month forever
  • Patient lifespan with disease: 30 years
  • Total revenue per patient: $180,000
  • Number of patients: 37 million (US alone)
  • Total addressable market: $6.66 trillion

A Cure Would Be Worth:

  • One-time payment: Maybe $10,000
  • Lost future revenue: $170,000 per patient
  • CEOโ€™s reaction: โ€œFire whoever suggested thisโ€

This is why weโ€™ve cured exactly zero chronic diseases since Hepatitis C in 2014. Itโ€™s not a conspiracy. Itโ€™s math.

The Solution: Split the Savings

Hereโ€™s the simple fix: When a company cures a disease, they get 50% of the healthcare costs that would have been spent treating it.

The New Math:

  • Healthcare system saves: $180,000 per diabetic
  • Pharma company gets: $90,000 per cure
  • Patient pays: $0-1,000 (covered by insurance)
  • Everyone wins except: The disease

How It Works

Step 1: Calculate the True Cost of Disease

Every disease has a lifetime price tag:

Disease Average Lifetime Cost Annual Deaths Total Market
Heart Disease $750,000 695,000 $521B
Cancer $450,000 609,000 $274B
Alzheimerโ€™s $580,000 120,000 $70B
Diabetes $180,000 102,000 $18B
Total Top 4 $490,000 avg 1.5M $883B

These arenโ€™t treatment costs. These are total economic costs: Healthcare, lost productivity, family burden, everything.

Step 2: Offer Half to Whoever Cures It

Simple contract:

  • Cure the disease
  • The system pays 50% of savings
  • Payment over 10-20 years as savings materialize
  • Verified by actual healthcare spending data

Step 3: Watch Capitalism Do Its Thing

Before:

  • Diabetes treatment market: $500/month ร— 37M people = $222B/year
  • Incentive: Keep everyone diabetic forever

After:

  • Diabetes cure market: $90,000 ร— 37M people = $3.33 trillion
  • Incentive: Cure everyone immediately

Suddenly, curing diabetes is worth 15X more than treating it.

Real-World Example: The Cancer Math

Letโ€™s say Pfizer develops a universal cancer cure tomorrow.

Current Cancer Treatment Market:

  • Annual revenue: $200 billion
  • Growth rate: 7% annually
  • 30-year NPV: $4.2 trillion

50/50 Cure Payment Model:

  • Lives saved: 10 million annually
  • Cost saved per life: $450,000
  • Pfizerโ€™s share: $225,000 per cure
  • Annual payment: $2.25 trillion
  • 10-year total: $22.5 trillion

The CEOโ€™s Reaction: โ€œCURE EVERYTHING. NOW.โ€

Why Healthcare Systems Would Pay

โ€œBut wait,โ€ you say, โ€œwhy would insurance companies pay trillions for cures?โ€

Because theyโ€™re already paying more for treatments:

Insurance Company Perspective:

  • Current: Pay $750,000 per heart disease patient
  • With cure: Pay $375,000 once
  • Savings: $375,000 per patient
  • ROI: Instant 50% return

Itโ€™s like buying something at half price. Youโ€™d be stupid not to.

The Preventative Medicine Bonus

This model works even better for prevention:

Longevity Therapy Example:

  • Delays aging by 10 years
  • Reduces annual healthcare costs by $5,000/person
  • 30-year savings: $150,000
  • Developer payment: $75,000 per person
  • Global market: 8 billion ร— $75,000 = $600 trillion

Suddenly, keeping people healthy becomes the worldโ€™s most valuable business.

How to Calculate Savings (The Non-Scammy Way)

For Specific Disease Cures

  1. Historical data: Average treatment cost for disease
  2. Multiply by: Number of patients who would have gotten it
  3. Subtract: Cost of cure delivery
  4. Split: 50/50

For Preventative Treatments

  1. Baseline: Current per-capita healthcare spending by age
  2. Treatment group: Actual spending after intervention
  3. Difference: The savings
  4. Split: 50/50

For Longevity Treatments

  1. Compare: Treated vs untreated population health costs
  2. Adjust for: Demographics and other factors
  3. Calculate: Net reduction in spending
  4. Split: 50/50

All verified by actual claims data. No estimates. No projections. Just math.

The Beautiful Incentive Cascade

Once one company succeeds:

Year 1: First diabetes cure, $3.3 trillion market created Year 2: Every pharma company pivots to cures Year 3: Heart disease cured Year 5: Cancer eliminated Year 10: Aging significantly slowed Year 20: Death becomes mostly optional

Each success makes the next one more inevitable. Itโ€™s a greed avalanche in the right direction.

Objections from People Who Profit from Disease

โ€œBut pharma companies need recurring revenue!โ€

  • Theyโ€™ll get it from the 50% payments over 10-20 years
  • Plus new diseases will always emerge (thanks, evolution)
  • Plus aging creates infinite demand

โ€œThis would bankrupt healthcare systems!โ€

  • Theyโ€™re already bankrupt from paying for treatments
  • This cuts their costs in half
  • Bankruptcy from success > bankruptcy from failure

โ€œHow do we verify the savings?โ€

  • Every insurance claim is digital
  • Match treated patients vs statistical controls
  • Blockchain for transparency
  • Fraud = lose all future payments

โ€œWhat about rare diseases?โ€

  • Pool them together
  • Same 50/50 split on aggregate savings
  • Suddenly profitable to cure diseases affecting 12 people

Implementation: Surprisingly Easy

Step 1: Pass legislation allowing 50/50 contracts Step 2: Let insurance companies offer them Step 3: Watch pharma companies compete to cure everything Step 4: Try not to die before your disease gets cured

No new bureaucracy. No government funding. Just changing what we pay for.

The Global Impact

If implemented worldwide:

  • Healthcare costs: Drop 50-75% within 20 years
  • Human lifespan: Increase 20-40 years
  • Economic productivity: Massive increase from healthy population
  • Pharma profits: Higher than ever (but from cures, not suffering)

Why This Isnโ€™t Already Happening

Simple: Nobodyโ€™s incentivized to change the system.

  • Politicians: Get donations from treatment companies
  • Regulators: Revolving door with industry
  • Insurance: Can always raise premiums
  • Pharma: Making bank on suffering
  • Patients: Too sick to organize

But the math is undeniable. The first country to implement this wins the future.

The Bottom Line

We donโ€™t need to make pharmaceutical companies moral. We just need to make curing diseases more profitable than treating them.

50/50 savings split does exactly that.

Your diabetes: Worth $180,000 as a lifelong disease Your diabetes cure: Worth $90,000 in shared savings Pharmaโ€™s choice: Obvious

The only question is whether we implement this before or after you die from something curable.


P.S. - Every pharmaceutical executive reading this is doing math right now. The smart ones are pivoting to cures. The others will be bankrupt within a decade. Greed finds a way.